Archive for July, 2007

Clergy sex scandal a lesson for all

drchris July 19th, 2007

Truth must be accepted always

The recent revelation of the sex scandal of our clergy in the United States has dealt a serious blow to our Catholic Church and is source of worry and embarrassment for all Catholics. The international media left to stone unturned to inflict the greatest degree of insult on the Catholic Church.

In a quick vote conducted by CNN’s Larry King Live on 17th.July 2007, revealed that 79% of the more than 4,000 respondents said they have lost confidence in the Catholic Church. This is very distressing and I dread to imagine the state of our Church in the future.

Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles must be praised for his courage to offer a public apology to the victims of the scandal. The $660 Million paid to the victim as compensation is indeed a very large sum, which surpasses the national budget of some countries.

Sexual abuses may be among the commonest crimes these days all over the world but the attempted cover up at the highest level of the hierarchy is a much bigger offence than the crime itself. If such abuses can occur in a society that is as highly literate and liberal as in U.S.,it is frightening to imagine what may be happening in poor,illitrate countries with dictatorial regimes.

It is unthinkable that such crimes were committed by our own priests against innocent children from their own congregation. It is even more dreadful to imagine they have continued to carry out their sacred liturgical functions despite living in such sinful states which they condemn in their sermons every week.

It is natural for us to shun from discussing the whole incident due to embarassment.Instead of sweeping it under the carpet, we should use it as a lesson to prevent similar activities in the future. Truth however bitter must be accepted however bitter it may be.

The scandal calls for a review of the selection and training of our priests. We may be facing an acute shortage of priests but does that give us the reason to select anyone who comes by? Why are our young men shunning the priesthood as a vocation? Why aren’t the teachings of the Church attractive to the youth? Are we becoming irrelevant in the lives of modern man? These are the hard questions on which we must ponder and to which we must find honest answers.

This scandal must also be a lesson for us all who claim to be followers of Christ. We must ask Christ to give us not just the courage, strength and wisdom to fight all the worldly temptations of greed and lust but also the humility to accept our weaknesses and seek forgiveness from those whom we have hurt.

Let us offer special prayers for those innocent victims of the sex abuse. We pray for a speedy recovery from the wounds of their assault. Let us also pray for our priests who were involved in the scandal. May they find consolation and forgiveness in the mercy of Christ.

Dr.Chris Anthony

Comments

CARDINAL ROGER MAHONY CORAGIOUS ?

BETTER HAVE YOURSELF CHECKED OUT CHRIS–YOU MIGHT BE IN A COMA.

SCUM LIKE MAHONY LEND LIP SERVICE FOR HIS OWN BENEFIT. SAYING SORRY DOESN’T COST HIM A CENT.

REMEMBER A FEW YEARS AGO WHEN BISHOPS WOULDN’T APOLOGIZE ? PR GUYS ADVISED THEM TO WAKE UP.

YOU ARE WRITING ABOUT AN EVIL CHURCH, THAT HAS BEEN EVIL FOR NEAR 2000 YEARS.

WOULD YOU DARE A GUESS HOW MANY CHILDREN HAVE BEEN RAPED AND/OR SODOMIZED BY CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN THE LAST 1800 YEARS ?—AND COVERED UP BY BISHOPS ?

YOU WOULD HAVE TO COUNT IN THE BILLIONS.
ALSO, DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN SOME PEOPLE WERE CALLED CHURCH BASHERS? WONDER WHAT THEY WERE BASHING ABOUT ?

VICTIM/SURVIVOR–1948
lionel dube

TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT YOUR CHURCH

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/AbuseTracker/
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/


Ckergy sex scandal - apology

drchris July 15th, 2007

LA cardinal apologizes to plaintiffs
By GILLIAN FLACCUS,
Associated Press Writer
16 July 2007

LOS ANGELES - Cardinal Roger Mahony, leader of the nation’s largest Roman Catholic archdiocese, apologized Sunday to the hundreds of people who will get a share of a $660 million settlement over allegations of clergy sex abuse.
“There really is no way to go back and give them that innocence that was taken from them. … The one thing I wish I could give the victims, I cannot,” he said.

“Once again, I apologize to anyone who has been offended, who has been abused. … It should not have happened and should not ever happen again.”

Mahony said that he has met in the past 14 months with dozens of people alleging clergy abuse and that those meetings helped him understand the importance of a quick resolution to what he called a “terrible sin and crime.”

The settlement will not affect the archdiocese’s core ministry, Mahony said, but the church will have to sell buildings, use some of its invested funds and borrow money. The archdiocese will not sell any parish property, he said.
“We gather today because this long journey has now come to an end, and a new chapter of that journey is beginning,” Mahony told reporters.

The deal between the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles and more than 500 alleged victims of clergy sexual abuse reached late Saturday is by far the largest payout since the nationwide clergy abuse scandal emerged in 2002 in Boston.

The settlement also calls for the release of priests’ confidential personnel files after review by a judge. According to Tod Tamberg, spokesman for the archdiocese, the settlement had not required Mahony to make his public apology.

Earlier Sunday, Mahony presided over Mass at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels in downtown Los Angeles without directly addressing the settlement. The service did include a prayer for victims of clergy abuse.
Mahony and all parties are expected before a Los Angeles Superior Court judge on Monday to enter the settlement into the court record, attorneys said.

“I think for those of us who have been involved in this for more than five years, it’s a huge relief,” said Michael Hennigan, archdiocese attorney. “But it’s a disappointment, too, that we didn’t get it done much earlier than this.”
Parishioners reacted with disappointment and relief to the settlement.

Vivian Viscarra, 50, who attends Mass at the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels three times a month, said the victims deserve the payout even though it could hurt the church’s ability to deliver important services. The amount would average a little more than $1.3 million per plaintiff, although individual payouts will vary according to the severity and duration of the abuse.

“I am disappointed,” Viscarra said. “And it’s making me re-evaluate my views of whether people in the ministry should be married. People do have needs.”

Chris Parra, who attends Mass every Sunday, said she couldn’t help thinking about the settlement when she shook Mahony’s hand on the way out of the cathedral.
“Even when I was standing there, shaking his hand, I was thinking about how he’s finally going to release the priests’ personnel records and I wondered to myself why didn’t he do that sooner,” she said, holding her baby, Tomas.
Parra said she was upset that her tithing would go toward paying the settlement.

“I still want my children to follow the church’s guidelines and foundation because that’s how I was raised,” she said. “But there’s still a lot of healing to be done.”

The deal settles all 508 cases that remained against the archdiocese, which also paid $60 million in December to settle 45 cases that weren’t covered by sexual abuse insurance.

Under the latest deal, the archdiocese will pay $250 million, insurance carriers will pay a combined $227 million and several religious orders will chip in $60 million. The remaining $123 million will come from litigation with religious orders that chose not to participate in the deal, with the archdiocese guaranteeing resolution of those 80 to 100 cases within five years, Hennigan said. The archdiocese is released from liability in those claims, Tamberg said.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys can expect to receive as much as 40 percent of the settlement money — or $264 million — for their work.

Standing outside the cathedral, Mary Grant, spokeswoman for Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, said the settlement did not end suffering for the thousands of victims of clergy abuse.

“This is not over,” she said. “Church officials would like to think that this settlement means everything is OK. … But this is not a magic wand.”

The settlements push the total amount paid out by the U.S. church since 1950 to more than $2 billion, with about a quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese. A judge must sign off on the agreement.
The Los Angeles archdiocese, its insurers and various Roman Catholic orders have paid more than $114 million to settle 86 claims so far.

Several religious orders in California have also reached multimillion-dollar settlements in recent months, including the Carmelites, the Franciscans and the Jesuits.S. church since 1950 to more than $2 billion, with about a quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese. A judge must sign off on the agreement.
The Los Angeles archdiocese, its insurers and various Roman Catholic orders have paid more than $114 million to settle 86 claims so far.

Several religious orders in California have also reached multimillion-dollar settlements in recent months, including the Carmelites, the Franciscans and the Jesuits.

Clergy sex scandal - paying to cover embarrassment

drchris July 15th, 2007

LA church to pay $600M for clergy abuse

By GILLIAN FLACCUS,
Associated Press Writer
15 July 2007

The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles reached a settlement agreement Saturday with more than 500 people who allege they were sexually abused by clergy, the main plaintiff’s attorney told The Associated Press.

Attorneys for the archdiocese, the nation’s largest, and the plaintiffs will release a joint statement Sunday morning and hold a news conference Monday, said plaintiff’s attorney Ray Boucher.

The deal is valued at $660 million, according to a source who spoke on condition of anonymity because the settlement had not been officially announced. It is by far the largest payout in the church’s sexual abuse scandal, and it exceeded earlier reports from sources that the settlement would be between $600 million and $650 million — $1.2 million and $1.3 million per plaintiff.

This is a breaking news update. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles will settle its clergy abuse cases for at least $600 million, by far the largest payout in the church’s sexual abuse scandal, The Associated Press learned Saturday.

Attorneys for the archdiocese and the plaintiffs are expected to announce the deal Monday, the day the first of more than 500 clergy abuse cases was scheduled for jury selection, according to two people with knowledge of the agreement. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because the settlement had not been made public.

The archdiocese and its insurers will pay between $600 million and $650 million to about 500 plaintiffs — an average of $1.2 million to $1.3 million per person. The settlement also calls for the release of confidential priest personnel files after review by a judge assigned to oversee the litigation, the sources said.

The settlements would push the total amount paid out by the U.S. church since 1950 to more than $2 billion, with about a quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese.
It wasn’t immediately clear how the payout would be split among the insurers, the archdiocese and several Roman Catholic religious orders. A judge must sign off on the agreement, and final details were being ironed out.

Lead plaintiffs’ attorney Ray Boucher confirmed the sides were working on a deal but would not discuss specifics. He said that negotiations would continue through the weekend and that there were still many unresolved aspects.
Tod Tamberg, archdiocese spokesman, declined to comment on any settlement details.

“The archdiocese will be in court Monday morning,” he said.
Steven Sanchez, 47, was one of the plaintiffs set to go to trial Monday. He was expected to testify in the trial involving the late Rev. Clinton Hagenbach.

Sanchez, a financial adviser, said the past few months have been especially difficult because he had to repeat his story of abuse for depositions with his attorneys and archdiocese attorneys in preparation for trial.

“We’re 48 hours away from starting the trial, and I’ve been spending a lot of time getting emotionally prepared to take them on, but I’m glad,” he said. “It’s been a long five years.”

A spokeswoman for the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests said at a news conference outside the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels on Saturday that the group had not been apprised of any settlement, and that no such deal would stop anyone’s suffering.

“No matter what happens, no resolution, guilty verdict or settlement magically takes away the pain of having been raped or molested by Catholic priests in this archdiocese,” said Mary Grant, the group’s regional director.

The settlement would be the largest ever by a Roman Catholic archdiocese since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in Boston in 2002. The largest payout so far has been by the Diocese of Orange, Calif., in 2004, for $100 million.

Facing a flood of abuse claims, five dioceses — Tucson, Ariz.; Spokane, Wash.; Portland, Ore.; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego — sought bankruptcy protection.
The Los Angeles archdiocese, its insurers and various Roman Catholic orders have paid more than $114 million to settle 86 claims so far.

The largest of those came in December, when the archdiocese reached a $60 million settlement with 45 people whose claims dated from before the mid-1950s and after 1987 — periods when it had little or no sexual abuse insurance. Several religious orders in California have also reached multimillion-dollar settlements in recent months, including the Carmelites, the Franciscans and the Jesuits.

However, more than 500 other lawsuits against the archdiocese had remained unresolved despite years of legal wrangling. Most of the outstanding lawsuits were generated by a 2002 state law that revoked for one year the statute of limitations for reporting sexual abuse.

Cardinal Roger Mahony recently told parishioners in an open letter that the archdiocese was selling its high-rise administrative building and considering the sale of about 50 other nonessential church properties to raise funds for a settlement.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge overseeing the cases recently ruled that Mahony could be called to testify in the second trial on schedule, and attorneys for plaintiffs wanted to call him in many more.

The same judge also cleared the way for four people to seek punitive damages — something that could have opened the church to tens of millions of dollars in payouts if the ruling had been expanded to other cases.S. church since 1950 to more than $2 billion, with about a quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese.

It wasn’t immediately clear how the payout would be split among the insurers, the archdiocese and several Roman Catholic religious orders. A judge must sign off on the agreement, and final details were being ironed out.
Lead plaintiffs’ attorney Ray Boucher confirmed the sides were working on a deal but would not discuss specifics. He said that negotiations would continue through the weekend and that there were still many unresolved aspects.

Tod Tamberg, archdiocese spokesman, declined to comment on any settlement details.
“The archdiocese will be in court Monday morning,” he said.
Steven Sanchez, 47, was one of the plaintiffs set to go to trial Monday. He was expected to testify in the trial involving the late Rev. Clinton Hagenbach.

Sanchez, a financial adviser, said the past few months have been especially difficult because he had to repeat his story of abuse for depositions with his attorneys and archdiocese attorneys in preparation for trial.

“We’re 48 hours away from starting the trial, and I’ve been spending a lot of time getting emotionally prepared to take them on, but I’m glad,” he said. “It’s been a long five years.”
A spokeswoman for the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests said at a news conference outside the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels on Saturday that the group had not been apprised of any settlement, and that no such deal would stop anyone’s suffering.

“No matter what happens, no resolution, guilty verdict or settlement magically takes away the pain of having been raped or molested by Catholic priests in this archdiocese,” said Mary Grant, the group’s regional director.

The settlement would be the largest ever by a Roman Catholic archdiocese since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in Boston in 2002. The largest payout so far has been by the Diocese of Orange, Calif., in 2004, for $100 million.

Facing a flood of abuse claims, five dioceses — Tucson, Ariz.; Spokane, Wash.; Portland, Ore.; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego — sought bankruptcy protection.

The Los Angeles archdiocese, its insurers and various Roman Catholic orders have paid more than $114 million to settle 86 claims so far.

The largest of those came in December, when the archdiocese reached a $60 million settlement with 45 people whose claims dated from before the mid-1950s and after 1987 — periods when it had little or no sexual abuse insurance. Several religious orders in California have also reached multimillion-dollar settlements in recent months, including the Carmelites, the Franciscans and the Jesuits.
However, more than 500 other lawsuits against the archdiocese had remained unresolved despite years of legal wrangling. Most of the outstanding lawsuits were generated by a 2002 state law that revoked for one year the statute of limitations for reporting sexual abuse.

Cardinal Roger Mahony recently told parishioners in an open letter that the archdiocese was selling its high-rise administrative building and considering the sale of about 50 other nonessential church properties to raise funds for a settlement.

A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge overseeing the cases recently ruled that Mahony could be called to testify in the second trial on schedule, and attorneys for plaintiffs wanted to call him in many more.

The same judge also cleared the way for four people to seek punitive damages — something that could have opened the church to tens of millions of dollars in payouts if the ruling had been expanded to other cases.

The Good Samaritan

drchris July 15th, 2007

Date published: Sunday, July 15, 2007

Whose schedule really matters?

Reflecting on our Sunday Readings

15th Sunday in Ordinary Time
July 15, 2007
Readings: Dt 30:10 -14; Col 1: 15-20; Luke 10: 25-37

Usually when we hear the parable of the Good Samaritan the priest will note in his homily that those who passed up the poor man were part of the Temple ritual and should not be confused with Christian or Catholic Church priests or Church workers. I’m not so sure.

Yes, the priest and Levite of the parable had to avoid ritual impurity and would not have been able to serve their function in the Temple if they had touched a dead or diseased person. But I am not so sure that the parable couldn’t point to all of us, priests and Church workers included.

With the growth of the people in the faith and the shortage of priests, we priests are busier than ever. But, are we too busy to be compassionate? When a person comes to the office crying, when a wife calls to ask if someone could see her husband before he dies, when a young couple need to deal with a crisis, a priest has to forego his schedule, or make an appropriate accommodation, and show compassion for those who are hurting. All Church workers as well as those who teach in our schools and childhood centres need to do the same. If we don’t, and when we don’t, then we become so busy doing our work that we miss the Lord reaching out to us. “But, I’m doing the Lord’s work,” we might protest, and we do so protest. Then we are confronted with this rhetorical question: “How can you be doing the Lord’s work if you are missing the presence of the Lord reaching out for help?”
It is the same for all Christians. We cannot claim that we are doing something good if the major action of our Christianity is mere attendance in Church.

Recently I was speaking with a young mom who got herself into a bit of a predicament marriage-wise. Actually, it was the lack of the marriage that made the predicament. She was in my office with her fiancé as we were getting things straightened out for them both. As an aside, let me say that I often mention to people that our lives would be wonderful if we went in a straight line from the starting line to the finishing line, but sadly none of us do. What is important is that we find ways to get to that finishing line. Anyway, so you can see I had two good people in my office who were not in a proper relationship but who were working on it. Back to the story, the girl told me about a friend of hers who was killed and how she and her fiancé were spending all sorts of time with the friend’s family as well as writing to them, sending them notes encouraging them to keep the faith and to know that God was with them. I said to myself, “Now this is a good Christian and a Good Samaritan.” She may not be seen by some to be in the mainstream of religious life like the Samaritan of the parable, but she knows what she needs to do to be a Christian. She needs to be compassionate.
Good Christian husbands, when your wives are having a down day, or are in a funk, perhaps feeling overwhelmed and under-appreciated, be good Christians and good Catholics and drop whatever you are doing to just be with her. Don’t be concerned like most men with accomplishing something, or even with solving her problems. You can’t. Just be present for her and with her, even if you do nothing more than chat. That is being compassionate. That is being a Good Samaritan.

Good Christian wives, when your husband is so concerned over providing better for the family, and is full of anxiety wondering how you are going to pay for your ordinary expenses, let alone the kids’ college and your own future, just let him know that you and he will always be together, you will always have love and God will take care of the rest. All of us men have a lot of ‘little boy’ in us that needs to hear someone we love tell us everything is going to be OK. That is how you ladies can be Good Samaritans.
Good Christian parents, stop being so concerned with filling your children’s schedule and be more concerned with being physically present to hear their needs when they express them. Maybe the folks next door have their kids in every activity possible. If that works for them, great. But being a Good Samaritan for your own children is being available to be compassionate for them.

Good Christian children and Teens, your Mom and Dad love you, but they are not perfect. Like you, God is still working on them. He’s basically working on them through you teaching them new levels of patience and understanding. Even still, the worse thing that bothers your parents is when they think they have not been as good parents as they could have been. When you know they feel bad about how they reacted to something you said or did, how about letting it go and give them a hug or kiss? Better yet, how about not provoking them and do your part in the family-chores, etc.
Good Christians, all of us, we need to stop trying to “schedule Jesus”. Jesus is not on our schedule. We are on His schedule. And He is on the schedule of those who need us to show compassion.

Pray, all of us, that we don’t overlook His presence when He reaches out to us in those who need our love, our charity. — Fr Joseph Pellegrino

From the Early Church

Who is my neighbour?

To interpret the parable of the Good Samaritan, one of the elders used to say that the man going down from Jerusalem to Jericho was Adam. He said Jerusalem was paradise, Jericho was the world, and the brigands were enemy powers. The priest was the law, the Levite the prophets, and the Samaritan Christ.

Adam’s wounds were his disobedience, the animal that carried him was the body of the Lord, and the “pandochium” or inn, open to all who wished to enter, was the Church. The two denarii represented the Father and the Son, and the innkeeper was the head of the Church, who was entrusted with its administration. The promised return of the Samaritan was a figure of the second coming of the Saviour.

The Samaritan was carrying oil — oil to make his face shine as scripture says, referring surely to the face of the man he cared for. He cleansed the man’s wounds with oil to soothe the inflammation and with wine that made them smart, and then placed him on his own mount, that is, on his own body, since he had condescended to assume our humanity.

This Samaritan bore our sins and suffered on our behalf; he carried the half dead man to the inn which takes in everyone, denying no one its help; in other words, to the Church. To this inn Jesus invites all when he says: Come to me, all who labour and are overburdened, and I will give you new strength.

After bringing in the man half-dead the Samaritan did not immediately depart, but remained and dressed his wounds by night as well as by day, showing his concern and doing everything he could for him.

In the morning when he wished to set out again he took from his own purse silver coins, from his own sterling money, two denarii to pay the innkeeper — clearly the angel of the Church — and ordered him to nurse with all diligence and restore to health the man whom for a short time he himself had personally tended.

This guardian of souls who showed mercy to the man who fell into the hands of brigands was a better neighbour to him than were either the law or the prophets, and he proved this more by deeds than by words.

Now the saying: Be imitators of me as I am of Christ makes it clear that we can imitate Christ by showing mercy to those who have fallen into the hands of brigands. We can go to them, bandage their wounds after pouring in oil and wine, place them on our own mount, and bear their burdens.

Get your free Catholic Blog at StBlogs Catholic Blogs